Monitorizarea si Protectia Animalelor
We considered once again that the road leading to normality in which the laws governing the sanitary-veterinary field are elaborated through the prism of the national interest, not based on the pursuit of financial advantages. But we have a well-founded suspicion that this is not the case, through deduction and logical analysis of the facts.
Precisely for this reason, after previously requesting the cancellation, together with our partners we are intervening in file no. 1503/2/2021 pending before the Bucharest Court of Appeal, having as object the suspension of the execution of GD 20/2021 by which the modification of GD 1059/2013 is desired. On Tuesday, 20.04.2021, the court will decide the fate of this administrative act. We will briefly present the content of the notes submitted to the file for a brief presentation.
Among the countless abuses, dedicated bills and treacherous intentions disguised as "noble purposes", we have once again identified an attempt to defraud and procure a double financial gain by "innocent" amendment of GD 1059/2013. Ionut)
The old form of art. 3 para. 1 of GD 1059/2013 allowed that the specialized services for the management of stray dogs can conclude collaboration protocols with the administrative-territorial units with which it borders. To this, the new provision added the phrase "as well as with any other administrative-territorial unit within the county".
Basically, we can see again the creation of the bicephalous business, of some parallel budgetary systems, as we have been accustomed to by ANSVSA until now. More precisely, through this modification, the loophole was opened through which, although there are shelters of the administrative-territorial units, others can be built, supported by the county budget fund. The main idea of this strategy is to build other animal shelters and slaughter services, parallel to those that already exist, formed by the collaboration of neighboring and paid ATUs, even built by voluntarily affiliated town halls.
These double structures formed by the privatization of some already existing and free services of ANSVSA are only meant to create means by which the public budget, formed by the taxpayers' money, to reach twice the same political actors, as every time. The new shelters that will be created once the implementation of this law will be under the control of the county DSVSA directors, directors selected on political criteria, being ultimately led by ANSVSA.
It is important to keep in mind that the Second Cost-Efficiency Index has not been taken into account for a second, which is imperative to be respected every time a law sets out the directions in which public money will be allocated.
I noticed once again the superficiality of ANSVSA's conduct and the true intentions of its politically charged officials, especially in terms of inviting NGOs to mandatory consultations before issuing a law, these being only a facade, like a mask without any concrete utility and without to be able to influence the decision already taken. The frustration of the "Freiherites" at the consultations comes too late. why we process independently.
The parallelism created by ANSVSA is already beginning to form as a custom, being already a tradition of this institution. This case is confirmed by this statement, but also by other hypotheses that are difficult to forget. Among these we mention the parallel RECS service. Register of Master Dogs, in parallel with the national register at ANSVSA- Vaccine evidence and cartography which is free and mandatory. This parallel register is privatized by the payment directed to the members of the College of Veterinarians, which is in very close connection with ANSVSA, which accepts passively.
Later, we will remember the existence of the General Directorate of Official Control, the Animal Veterinary Sanitary Police Service, under the control of ANSVSA, with employees, positions and funds supported by the public budget. This direction is joined by his twin, the Animal Police created at the level of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, supported by county funds. As expected, both the first and the second animal police are under the official and unofficial subordination of ANSVSA through Veterinarians employed as Militiamen?
All this is just proof of the dysfunction and indolence of the system that pursues everything, but not the public health interest of animal welfare and biological safety of the country in times of global pandemic as a result of a Zoonosis out of the control of some authorities.
We will find out on Tuesday whether the honorable court will defend the general interest and take a few steps on the front of transparency, still fighting for general welfare and security, which must be done and put in the job description those who should defend our interests and public health in conjunction with animal welfare.